摘要:2015年中科院考博英語真題,更多關(guān)于考博英語的相關(guān)信息,請關(guān)注希賽網(wǎng)英語考試頻道。
Section B (20 minutes, 10 points)
Directions: In each ofthe following passages, five sentences have been removed from the original text. They are listed from A to F and put below the passage. Choose the most suitable sentence from the list to fill in each of the blanks (numbered 66 to 75). For each passage, there in one sentence that does not fit in any of the blanks. Mark your answers on your machine-scoring ANSWER SHEET.
Passage One
The Santa Ana appeals court upheld an earlier jury verdict awarding $ 3. 2 million in damages to Alexis Sarti who suffered serious nerve damage after a food poisoning episode at a restaurant. 66) In April 2005, Sarti ate raw tuna at the Salt Creek Grille restaurant. Afterwards, she suffered from sudden paralysis and double vision. She spent the next 49 days in the hospital, and had to drop out of college for more than a year and a half after the food poisoning incident, for medical care and therapy. 67) Muscles and spasms bother her on a daily basis, although she says she’s used to these now. She has recovered somewhat since then. But strenuous activity is out of the question, and what’s worse, she expects her situation to deteriorate as she gets older.
Sarti filed a lawsuit against the restaurant, and claimed cross contamination of the tuna with a form of bacteria that exists in raw poultry. 68) The verdict was set aside by Superior Court Judge Derek W. Hunt. The 4th District Court of Appeal in Santa Ana has now overturned Judge Hunt’s ruling.
In delivering his decision, Judge Hunt said he was constrained by a 35-year-old appellate decision that prohibits juries from assuming that cross contamination in the restaurants was the result of faulty practices of handling.
The Santa Ana appeals court seems to have disregarded that older appellate decision. 69) It has been cited for in^roper food storage, cross contamination and incorrect handling on three separate instances. It was clear that the negligent food handling practices at this restaurant were responsible for a deadly cross contamination that resulted in Sard’s food poisoning. 70) Still, she has incurred more than a million dollars worth of medical bills, and expects to need more medical care in the future.
A. At the trial , Sard’s attorneys argued that Salt Creek Grille has a record of poor handling practices in its kitchens.
B. Sarti said medical bills totaled about $ 1 million and she wants to put aside another $ 1 million for future expenses.
C. Sarti insists that the victory is a moral, rather than monetary one.
D. Once a high school cross country runner, Sarti today is unable to take part in sports like running, or other forms of extreme physical activity.
E. It’s a milestone decision that can now be cited across other food poisoning lawsuits.
F. A jury handed down a verdict for $ 3. 2 million, and Salt Creek Grille, which also has branches in New York and New Jersey, appealed.
點擊返回2015年中科院考博英語真題總卷<<<
考博英語自學(xué)神器:中國科學(xué)院大學(xué)-希賽學(xué)習(xí)包
版權(quán)輔導(dǎo)教材+推薦自學(xué)計劃+在線智能題庫+知識點練習(xí)+入群共同學(xué)習(xí)+1-2年服務(wù)期
考博英語培訓(xùn)課程:中國科學(xué)院-希賽課程
結(jié)合歷年考試真題,輔以相關(guān)理論知識,以輕松、簡化的語言教授,讓學(xué)生迅速掌握知識點及做題技巧。
小編推薦:
中國科學(xué)院2019考博英語網(wǎng)上報名方式
加入希賽網(wǎng),獲取更多考博英語相關(guān)信息,真題解析
考博英語備考資料免費領(lǐng)取
去領(lǐng)取
2025年考博英語考試
具體時間待通知